Why Riders Perform Risky Riding Behavior in Jakarta: The effects of Hazardous Situation, Gender, and Risk Perception

Dewi Maulina, Keyni Regina Danilasari, Fara Nazhira, Satara Samia Jufri


The relationship between risky riding behavior and traffic accidents has been identified in previous research. However, there is limited research that focuses on the interaction between internal and external factors and the effect this has on riders’ risky riding decisions. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of hazardous situations and gender on risk perception and risky riding behavior among motorcyclists. We focus on lane-splitting behavior as one of the most common risky riding behaviors among motorcyclists in Jakarta. A 2×2 mixed-groups factorial ANOVA (hazardous situation × gender) was conducted with 72 participant riders, male as well as female. Participants were asked to read different scenarios and watch six video clips that showed pro-risk and anti-risk hazardous situations. At the end of each clip, participants answered questions related to risk perception and lane splitting decisions. Results show that hazardous situations have a significant effect on each dimension of risk perception and on risky riding behavior. However, results suggest that gender has a significant effect only on two dimensions of risk perception, namely, efficacy and worry and insecurity. We also found a significant effect of the interaction between hazardous situations and gender on risk perception, which is the dimension of the likelihood of an accident. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that it is important for law enforcement to consider the role of risk perception when granting motorcycle licenses.


gender; lane-splitting; risk perception; hazardous situation; motorcyclists

Full Text:



Beanland, V., Pammer, K., Śledziowska, M., & Stone, A. (2015). Drivers’ attitudes and knowledge regarding motorcycle lane filtering practices. Australasian Road Safety Conference.

Chang, H., & Yeh, T. (2007). Motorcyclist accident involvement by age, gender, and risky behaviors in Taipei, Taiwan. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology And Behaviour, 10(2), 109-122.

Cox, W. (2016). Largest Cities in the World: 2016 | Newgeography.com. Newgeography.com. Retrieved 21 May 2017, from http://www.newgeography.com/content/005219-largest-cities-world-2016

Deery, H. (1999). Hazard and risk perception among young novice drivers. Journal of Safety Research, 30(4), 225–236.

Demographia world urban areas. (2017) (13th ed.). Retrieved from http://www.demographia.com/db-worldua.pdf

Dorn, L., & Machin, M.A. (2004). Learner driving experience questionnaire. Cranfield University, UK and University of Southern Queensland, Australia

Eby, D. (2004). Driving, Risky. Encyclopedia Of Applied Psychology, 627-632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b0-12-657410-3/00697-8

Endsley, M.R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32-64.

Falco, A., Piccirelli, A., Girardi, D., Dal Corso, L., & De Carlo, N. (2013). Risky riding behavior on two wheels: The role of cognitive, social, and personality variables among young adolescents. Journal Of Safety Research, 46, 47-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2013.03.002

FEMA. (April, 2009). A European agenda for motorcycle safety: The motorcyclists’ point of view. Federation of European Motorcyclists’ Associations (FEMA). Retrieved from http://www.fema.ridersrights.org/docs/EAMS2009.pdf.

Institute for Research in Public Safety Indiana University. (1979). Tri-Level Study Of The Causes Of Traffic Accidents: Final Report -Executive Summary. Indiana: Indiana University.

Lonczak, H., Neighbors, C., & Donovan, D. (2007). Predicting risky and angry driving as a function of gender. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39(3), 536-545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.09.010

Machin, M.A. & Sankey, K.S. (2008). Relationship between young drivers’ personality characteristics, risk perceptions, and driving behavior. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41, 541-547.

Maulina, D. (2015). The influence of risky-riding script, distance perception, and risk perception on risky-riding behavior among motorcysclists in pro-risk and anti-risk situations (Pengaruh script mengendara berisiko, persepsi jarak, dan persepsi risiko terhadap perilaku mengendara berisiko pada pengendara sepeda motor dalam situasi pro-risk dan anti-risk). (Dissertation)

Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2006). What causes the differences in driving between young men and women? The effects of gender roles and sex on young drivers’ driving behaviour and self-assessment of skills. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology And Behaviour, 9(4), 269-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2006.01.005

Petridou, E & Moutaski, M. (2000). Human factors in the causation of road traffic crashes. European Journal of Epidemiology, 16, 819-826.

Ram, T., & Chand, K. (2016). Effect of drivers’ risk perception and perception of driving tasks on road safety attitude. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology And Behaviour, 42, 162-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.07.012

Rhodes, N., & Pivik, K. (2011). Age and gender differences in risky driving: The roles of positive affect and risk perception. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(3), 923-931. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.015

Robichaud, M., Dugas, M., & Conway, M. (2003). Gender differences in worry and associated cognitive-behavioral variables. Journal Of Anxiety Disorders, 17(5), 501-516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0887-6185(02)00237-2

Rundmo, T., & Iversen, H. (2004). Risk perception and driving behaviour among adolescents in two Norwegian counties before and after a traffic safety campaign. Safety Science, 42(1), 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0925-7535(02)00047-4

Taylor, W., & Snyder, L. (2017). The influence of risk perception on safety: A laboratory study. Safety Science, 95, 116-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.02.011

Teigen, K.H. & Brun, W. (1997). Anticipating the future: Appraising risk and uncertainty. In R. Ranyard, W.R. Crozier, & O. Svenson (Eds), Decision making: Cognitive models and explanations. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

Tunnicliff, D.J. (2006). Psychosocial factors contributing to motorcyclists’ intended riding style: An application of an extended version of theory of planned behavior. (Master Thesis)

The Indonesian Central Bureau of Statistics (Badan Pusat Statistik). Jakarta in numbers 2015 (Jakarta dalam angka 2015). (2015) (1st ed.). Jakarta. Retrieved from https://jakarta.bps.go.id/backend/pdf_publikasi/Jakarta-Dalam-Angka-2015.pdf

The Indonesian Central Bureau of Statistics (Badan Pusat Statistik). Jakarta in numbers 2016 (Jakarta dalam angka 2016). (2016) (1st ed.). Jakarta. Retrieved from http://jakarta.bps.go.id/backend/pdf_publikasi/Jakarta-Dalam-Angka-2016.pdf

Useche, S., Ortiz, V., & Cendales, B. (2017). Stress-related psychosocial factors at work, fatigue, and risky driving behavior in bus rapid transport (BRT) drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 104, 106-114.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.023

Ullerberg, P. & Rundmo, T. (2003). Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers. Safety Science, 41, 427-443.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7454/proust.v1i1.23


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 The Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

PRoUSt secretariat:

Building B 1st Floor, Faculty of Psycology, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia.

Copyright © 2019 Psychological Research on Urban Society (PRoUSt).

2615-8582 (online), 2620-3960 (print).