Professional Experience in Investigative Interviewing Does Not Guarantee Strong Knowledge about Memory

Olivier Dodier, Frédéric Tomas, Mélany Payoux, Benjamin Elissalde

Abstract


We examined the knowledge of law enforcement officers regarding memory by conducting two levels of analysis. First, we compared memory-related knowledge and erroneous beliefs of officers (n = 200) and lay people (n = 403) and found similar low scores of knowledge across both groups as well as a greater number of erroneous beliefs among law enforcement officers. Second, we compared knowledge and erroneous beliefs of officers who had undergone training in investigative interviewing (n = 41) with those of their untrained counterparts (n = 159). Similar low scores in knowledge and false beliefs were found. However, when comparing officers who reported conducting five or more interviews per month (n = 82) to officers who reported conducting zero interviews per month (n = 43), we found that the first group expressed more erroneous beliefs. The results are discussed in line with previous research, in particular, studies on investigative interview practices.


Keywords


Belief; eyewitness memory; investigative memory; law enforcement; memory

Full Text:

PDF

References


Benton, T. R., Ross, D. F., Bradshaw, E., Thomas, W. N., & Bradshaw, G. S. (2006). Eyewitness memory is still not common sense: Comparing jurors, judges, and law enforcement to eyewitness experts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(1), 115-129. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1171

Byrne, S., & Hart, P. S. (2009). The boomerang effect a synthesis of findings and a preliminary theoretical framework. Annals of the International Communication Association, 33(1), 3-37.

Chaplin, C., & Shaw, J. (2016). Confidently wrong: Police endorsement of psycho-legal misconceptions. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 31(3), 208-216. DOI:10.1007/s11896-015-9182-5

Cook, P. J. (2008). Assessing urban crime and its control: An overview. NBER Working Paper, 13781. Doi:10.3386/w13781

Cyr, M., & Lamb, M. E. (2009). Assessing the effectiveness of the NICHD investigative interview Protocol when interviewing French-speaking alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Quebec. Child Abuse & Neglect, 33(5), 257-268. Doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.04.002

Dodier, O., & Payoux, M. (2017). Connaissances et croyances des psychologues et psychiatres experts judiciaires concernant le fonctionnement de la mémoire [French psychologists and psychiatrists serving as court experts’ knowledge and beliefs about memory]. L’Année Psychologique/Topics in Cognitive Psychology, 117(2), 139-171. Doi:10.4074/S0003503317000483

Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

Fisher, R. P., & Schreiber, N. (2007). Interview protocols for improving eyewitness memory. In M. P. Toglia, J. D. Read, D. F. Ross, & R. C. L. Lindsay (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology: Vol. 1. Memory for events (pp. 53–80). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2012). Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 39(6), 701-723.

Innocence Project. (2015). The causes of wrongful conviction. Retrieved from https://www.innocenceproject.org/#causes

Juang, L. & Luo, D. (2016). Legal Professionals' Knowledge of Eyewitness Testimony in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey. PLOS ONE, e0148116. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148116

Kask, K. (2011). Comparison of knowledge of law enforcement and lay people regarding eyewitness testimony. Juridica International, 18, 161-172.

Kebbel, M. R., & Milne, R. (1998). Police officers' perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. Journal of Social Psychology, 138(3), 323-330. Doi: 10.1080/00224549809600384

Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., & Esplin, P. W. (2008). Tell me what happened: Structured investigative interviews of child victims and witnesses. New York: Wiley.

Launay, C., & Py, J. (2015). Methods and aims of investigative interviewing of adult witnesses: An analysis of professional practices. Pratiques Psychologiques, 21(1), 55-70. Doi: 10.1016/j.prps.2014.11.001

Luther, K., Snook, B., Barron, T., & Lamb, M. E. (2015). Child interviewing practices in Canada: A box Score from field observations. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30(3), 204-212. Doi: 10.1007/s11896-014-9149-y

Magnussen, S., Anderson, J., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., Endestad, T., Goodman, G. S., … Zimmer, H. (2006). What people believe about memory. Memory, 14(5), 595-613. DOI: 10.1080/09658210600646716

Magnussen, S., & Melinder, A. (2012). What psychologists know and believe about memory: A survey of practitioners. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(1), 54-60. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1795

Melinder, A., & Magnussen, S. (2015). Psychologists and psychiatrists serving as expert witnesses in court: What do they know about eyewitness memory? Psychology, Crime and Law, 21(1), 53-61. DOI: 10.1080/1068316X.2014.915324

Office for National Statistics. (2018). Crime in England and Wales: Year ending June 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/crimeandjustice/bulletins/crimeinenglandandwales/yearendingjune2018

Powell, M. B., Hughes-Scholes, C. H., smith, R., & Sharman, S. J. (2015). The relationship between investigative interviewing experience and open-ended question usage. Police Practice and Research: An international Journal, 15(4), 283-292. Doi: 10.1080/15614263.2012.704170

Saks, M.J. & Koehler, J.J. (2005). The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science. Science, 309, 892-895. Doi: 10.1126/science.1111565

Wise, R. A., Safer, M. A., & Maro, C. M. (2011). What U.S. law enforcement officers know and believe about eyewitness factors, eyewitness interview and identification procedures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(3), 488-500. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1717

Wolfman, M., Brown, D., & Jose, P. (2016). Talking past each other: Interview and child verbal exchanges in forensic interviews. Law and Human Behavior, 40(2), 107-117. Doi: 10.1037/lhb0000171




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7454/proust.v2i1.49

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Olivier Dodier, Frédéric Tomas, Mélany Payoux, Benjamin Elissalde

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

PRoUSt secretariat:

Building B 1st Floor, Faculty of Psycology, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia.

Copyright © 2019 Psychological Research on Urban Society (PRoUSt).

2615-8582 (online), 2620-3960 (print).