Neuroscience, Wellbeing, and Urban Design: Our Universal Attraction to Vitality

Colin Ellard

Abstract


Although urban planners and architects have understood that there is a relationship between the design of a setting and our thoughts and emotions, it is only recently that we have had the tools to properly dissect this relationship. New methods for measuring brain states in field settings in immersive virtual reality have generated a host of novel findings, but a theme that connects many of these findings together is the idea that human beings have a deep affinity for vitality at every level from the interior of a home to an urban streetscape. Not only this, but recent evidence suggests that we respond to the vitality of scenes almost immediately, even after exposures as brief as 50 milliseconds, possibly using ambient visual processing mechanisms that rely on our peripheral visual field. Further, when we sense and respond to vitality, positive affect increases, which in turn promotes affiliation and buffers us against urban loneliness. I will present findings from experiments both in the laboratory and in the field that show the power of vitality to effect behavioural change, and I will argue that harnessing this power is one of the keys to building a psychologically sustainable city.


Keywords


urban design; urban streetscape; vitality; sustainable city.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams D (1987). Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency. London: William Heinemann Inc.

Alexander C (2003). The Phenomenon of Life. Berkeley: CES Publishing

Biederman I, & Vessel E (2006). Perceptual pleasure and the brain a novel theory explains why the brain craves information and seeks it through the senses. American Scientist, 3(94), 247-253.

Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Berlyne, D. (1971). Aesthetics and Psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Blakemore, S-J (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2 (8): 561–567.

Chalup SK, Hong K, & Ostwald MJ (2010). Simulating pareidolia of faces for architectural image analysis. International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications (IJCISIM), 2, 262-278.

Dzebic V (2018). Emotions and the environment: The variable effect of environmental complexity on pleasure and interest. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Dzebic V & Ellard . (2015). Dynamic experience of urban environment as influenced by visual complexity. Paper presented at the Biannual Conference on Environmental Psychology, Groningen, NL.

Ellard CG (2014). Psychology of construction sites. Paper presented at Entretiens Jacques Cartier, Montreal, PQ.

Ellard C (2015). Places of the Heart, New York: Bellevue Literary Press.

Ellard C & Montgomery C (2011). Testing, testing: A psychological study on city spaces and how they affect our body and mind. Retrieved from: http://cdn.bmwguggenheimlab.org/TESTING_TESTING_BMW_GUGGENHEIM_LAB_2013_2.pdf

Fintzi, A. R., & Mahon, B. Z. (2014). A bimodal tuning curve for spatial frequency across left and right human orbital frontal cortex during object recognition. Cerebral Cortex, 24(5), 1311-1318.

Gehl, J. and Svarre, B. (2013) How to Study Public Life, Washington DC: Island Press.

Goldhagen S (2017). Welcome to your world: How the Built Environment Shapes Our Lives. New York: Harper.

Heider F & Simmel M (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57(2), 243-259.

Johansson G (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics, 14(2), 201-211.

Kaplan, S. (1979). Perception of landscape: Conceptions and misconceptions. Environmental Aesthetics, 45-55.

Kaplan, S. (1987). Aesthetics, affect and cognition: Environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Behavior, 19(1), 3-32.

Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182.

Kaplan, S. (2001). Meditation, restoration, and the management of mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 480-506.

Kanwisher N, McDermott J & Chun MM (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11), 4302-4311.

Milner, A.D. & Goodale, M.A. (1995). The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Oliva A & Schyns PG (1997). Coarse blobs or fine edges? Evidence that information diagnosticity changes the perception of complex visual stimuli. Cognitive Psychology, 34(1), 72-107.

Rizzolatti, G; Sinigaglia, C (2016). The mirror mechanism: a basic principle of brain function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 17 (12), 757–765.

Rooney, K. K., Condia, R. J., & Loschky, L. C. (2017). Focal and ambient processing of built environments: Intellectual and atmospheric experiences of architecture. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 326.

Saygin, AP (2007). Superior temporal and premotor brain areas necessary for biological motion perception. Brain : A Journal of Neurology. 130 (Pt 9), 2452–2461.

Taylor R. P. (2006). Reduction of physiological stress using fractal art and architecture. Leonardo, 39, 245–25110.

Taylor RP, Spehar B, Van Donkelaar P & Hagerhall CM (2011). Perceptual and physiological responses to Jackson Pollock’s fractals. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 60.

Thompson P (1980). Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion. Perception, 9, 483-484.

Trevarthen, C. B. (1968). Two mechanisms of vision in primates. Psychologische Forschung, 31(4), 299-337.

Ulrich, RS (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I Altman and JF Wohlwill (eds), Behavior and the Natural Environment (pp. 85-125). US: Springer.

Ulrich RS (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420-421.

Valtchanov D & Ellard CG (2015). Cognitive and affective responses to natural scenes: Effects of low level visual properties on preference, cognitive load and eye movements. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 184-195.

Whyte W (1980). The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. NY: People for Public Spaces.

Yue X, Vessel, EA & Biederman I (2007). The neural basis of scene preferences. Neuroreport, 18(6), 525-529.

Zipp S & Storring N (2016). Vital Little Plans: The Short Works of Jane Jacobs. New York: Random House.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7454/proust.v3i1.81

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Colin Ellard

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

PRoUSt secretariat:

Building B 1st Floor, Faculty of Psycology, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 16424, Indonesia.

Copyright © 2019 Psychological Research on Urban Society (PRoUSt).

2615-8582 (online), 2620-3960 (print).